Opinion
premium

Smaller tracks need a stake in this new dawn for racing

Leodis Dream (Daniel Tudhope) wins the 5f handicapChester 8.5.19 Pic: Edward Whitaker
Independent tracks like Chester must be included in a premier programme for racingCredit: Edward Whitaker

Smaller tracks need a stake in this new dawn if the views of Bill Farnsworth (April 9) and James Sanderson and others (April 12) are a true reflection, racing’s mooted renewal programme in 2024 will markedly benefit the top racecourses and large ­race­course groups at the expense of the smaller, ­inde­pendent ones. 

The proposed plan to enrich and focus on the sport’s ‘premier’ racing might be described as the polar opposite of that phrase of the moment, levelling up.

If some of the plum Saturday fixtures, for example, owned by smaller independents like Musselburgh, Thirsk and Chester are to be sacrificed, these aspirational courses need to be given something lasting and worthwhile in return. 

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inLetters

Last updated

iconCopy