OpinionAnother View
premium

The stats clearly reveal why Irish handicappers look well treated when they travel over to Britain

Winners are being raised more for winning less competitive races in the UK

author image
Head of data (technical & development)
Inothewayurthinkin with connections after winning the Kim Muir
JP McManus (second right) with Inothewayurthinkin after winning the Kim Muir at this year's Cheltenham Festival Credit: John Grossick

Handicaps, by definition, are supposed to be tight, competitive races. But there are clear signs in Britain this simply isn’t the case when it comes to jump racing.

I was prompted to explore this issue by some interesting ideas put forward in these pages following JP McManus’s guest column last month, in which the legendary owner suggested races outside the Cheltenham Festival would become more competitive if a lower limit on the number of runners was imposed on handicaps at the big meeting.

In response, my colleague Lewis Porteous wrote that handicaps through the season would be more competitive if connections could be sure that winners of such races would not get a prohibitive hike from the handicapper, proposing a trial whereby winners were raised by a set amount for each win depending on the grade.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inAnother View

Last updated

iconCopy