PartialLogo
Comment
premium

Let's follow the French model and limit handicap ratings rises to the winners

Rustang (right): 'His rating was quite rightly raised when he won for us at Newbury this year. However, I do not believe horses who are beaten in handicaps should go up in the weights,' says Richard Hughes
Rustang (right): 'His rating was quite rightly raised when he won for us at Newbury this year. However, I do not believe horses who are beaten in handicaps should go up in the weights,' says Richard HughesCredit: Alan Crowhurst (Getty Images)

I have major issues with our handicapping system. In my opinion it would be improved by radical change. More horses should have more chance of winning – and for that to happen I believe only handicap winners should have their ratings raised.

The main problem with the way we handicap horses in Britain and Ireland is the system encourages people to cheat. That's what it does, and I think most people can see that's what it does.

It is obvious the lower the rating the better is the general rule in handicaps, unless you're trying to force your way into a race like the Grand National, Ebor or Hunt Cup. Moreover, it pays to start a horse in handicaps off the lowest possible mark as that gives you the greatest room within which to rise.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inComment

Last updated

iconCopy