PartialLogo
Comment
premium

'I made a huge mistake - but if it's the catalyst for change I'd be delighted'

Paul Hanagan believes penalties for interference offences need to be stronger
Paul Hanagan believes penalties for interference offences need to be strongerCredit: John Grossick (racingpost.com/photos)

Before I go any further, let me get one thing straight.

It's true I was happy with the BHA appeal board's decision to keep The Ridler as the Norfolk Stakes winner. I'm grateful to the panel and also want to thank the Professional Jockeys Association (PJA), owner Steve Bradley, my barrister Roderick Moore and James Doyle, who gave honest evidence. Yet, although I'm pleased and grateful to have won the Norfolk, it's not an easy race for me to watch.

The careless mistake I made at Royal Ascot was the biggest of my career. I was undoubtedly the cause of significant interference but I've regularly been on the receiving end. The reason why is the current interference rules and the way in which they are policed.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inComment

Last updated

iconCopy