Opinion
premium

Don't judge how well the new whip rules are working solely on the size of the bans handed out

France correspondent
Last week's column on the whip sparked much debate across racing
Whip bans totalling 123 days were handed out to four jockeys last weekCredit: Edward Whitaker

Nobody enjoys seeing riders clocking up major suspensions and there will no doubt be plenty of calls going into the Professional Jockeys Association after the latest round of whip bans.

Four riders up before the review committee on Thursday were stood down for 42, 35, 25 and 21 days, all for having fallen foul of the new regime at least three times and, in the case of Kielan Woods, for incurring the displeasure of officials on a fifth occasion. 

These are long suspensions in anyone’s language and the loss of income for each individual is going to be substantial. None of this is cause for celebration. But a wave of such bans was always going to come and there is logic to increasing the penalties for repeat offences in line with the way one-off issues are dealt with. 

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inAnother View

Last updated

iconCopy