OpinionPeter Scargill
premium

Disciplinary chief's criticism of trainers is a worrying look for racing - but here's how we get to grips with medication

Pete Scargill on a solution to a long-standing problem

author image
Deputy industry editor
Trainer Ben Brookhouse on Warren Hill
Ben Brookhouse: fined for failing to record medications given to horses at his yardCredit: Edward Whitaker

It should be imperative that, when caring for horses, trainers and vets employ robust systems and rigorous management. Two worrying cases last week suggest this isn't always happening.

In cases involving trainers Ben Brookhouse and David Evans, Clement Goldstone KC twice felt the need to pass comment before signing off the plea agreements that had been proposed, something that should prompt racing to reflect more broadly on the subject of medicating racehorses.

The first case related to an unannounced out-of-competition drug testing visit paid by BHA inspectors to Brookhouse’s stable in Newmarket in April last year. Samples were taken from 16 horses and, when tested, produced 24 screening findings, meaning something was detected that was being tested for.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inPeter Scargill

Last updated

iconCopy