OpinionAnother View
premium

Controversy over restricted races in Irish jump racing could have been averted with a little bit of diplomacy

author image
Features writer
Alan Sweetman

This month Horse Racing Ireland announced a schedule of 60 restricted races, designed in response to a handful of trainers' domination of Irish jump racing.  

What was supposed to be a 'good news' story has become contentious. The trainers targeted by the proposed changes have reportedly threatened litigation with what seems unseemly haste, given their position of privilege in the overall scheme. 

While many view the modifications benignly as a measure of positive discrimination, a cohort also sees the proposals as mere tinkering around the edges of a system that is endemically flawed, heavily loaded in favour of the 'superstables'.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inAnother View

Last updated

iconCopy