PartialLogo
Comment
premium

Appalling TV camera angles are infuriating me - especially when studying replays

The tv camera is more important than ever in horseracing, but some of the shots still leave a lot to be desired
The tv camera is more important than ever in horseracing, but some of the shots still leave a lot to be desiredCredit: Alan Crowhurst

I watch live racing and replays almost every day of the year. And if you're anything like me, I bet we're infuriated by the same thing: the standard of viewing.

Too often camera angles are deployed where you can only see a small percentage of the horses, giving the viewer no idea what is happening with most of the runners. Take the 4.45 at Newmarket on April 29 as an example. In a five-runner race, only one was on the screen for almost the whole of the final furlong. That is dismal.

Yes, the winner is the most important horse in the race, but those in behind can be of more interest for the future. Any number of factors can cost a runner a few lengths and punters need to be able to see everything that has happened to better inform them when the beaten horses appear again.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

author image
Handicapper

Published on inComment

Last updated

iconCopy